|
|
|
|
|
Subject based multi-functional teams providing a
range of information and research services to clients |
|
|
|
Results |
|
|
|
Client focus – tailored information and research |
|
‘information that is relevant to me’ |
|
|
|
Specialist services – select committees |
|
|
|
Staff development – specialist knowledge |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Access to information |
|
|
|
Electoral reform |
|
|
|
Client demand |
|
|
|
“ I’d like to see nothing irrelevant come across
my desk from the Library” |
|
|
|
“Can I speak to the legal researcher” |
|
|
|
“I want analysis of information not lists” |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advantages – clients |
|
Subject specialist services |
|
|
|
Disadvantages – staff |
|
Staffing levels |
|
Subject expertise |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 teams |
|
3 Subject teams |
|
Economics and Industry |
|
Law and Government |
|
Social Policy |
|
Resources |
|
External Services |
|
Parliamentary Information Services |
|
International Documents |
|
History and Heritage |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager |
|
Workflow Co-ordinator |
|
E-services Co-ordinator |
|
Research Analyst |
|
Research Librarian |
|
Indexer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From information providers to subject
specialists |
|
‘Answers not just information’ |
|
Research for select committees |
|
Specialist knowledge |
|
Team dynamics |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recruitment |
|
Salaries |
|
Retaining specialist knowledge |
|
Building capacity |
|
Infrastructure |
|
Client demand |
|
|
|
|
|